This past weekend I attended a two-day, mediation-training workshop with Peacemaker’s Ministries. Overall the experience was positive, hearing from mediation experts and having a plethora of case-study simulations to role-play. As I appreciate Peacemakers adherence to scriptural applications in conflict coaching, meditation, and arbitrations, I have a hard time using their mnemonic tools that show an addiction towards alliteration, acrostics, and acronyms.
I am uncertain if this is a generational thing or just my bent towards critical thinking, but I tend resist such techniques, finding them cheesy and forced, therefore cheapening the lesson and experience.
One of the acrostics that I preferred reformatted was G.O.S.P.E.L., which unveils the order in which a mediation process should have. You are asked to present this acrostic at the beginning of your mediation time to help show the process, but I can’t do it without “rolling my eyes.” Peacemakers outlines it this way:
Greeting and ground rules
Opening statements
Story telling
Problem identification and clarification
Explore solutions
Lead to agreement.
My issue with such a device is that it locks you in to an order that really isn’t best for group ownership, nor provides a logical flow in conflict resolution (in my opinion). It makes me wonder if the process was forced into these steps so they would spell “gospel” instead of it actually being the best approach.
As I agree you need a basic strategy and flow for mediation, I prefer to use more of a story or image-based device. The word picture I have created provides the parties with a picture of being on a journey towards an agreed upon destination. To get to this destination, the obstacles in their way must be dealt with, leading to an agreed-upon bridge.
You can see my reformation of G.O.S.P.E.L. HERE.







